WOMEN IN TECHNICAL WORK

 

IN ATLANTIC CANADA


 

 

WOMEN IN TECHNICAL WORK IN ATLANTIC CANADA

 

 

a community research project funded by the Women's Program,

Status of Women Canada

 

 

March, 1998

 

 

Written by: Brenda Grzetic

 

Researchers:

Newfoundland and Labrador: Barbara Forbes and Brenda Grzetic

New Brunswick: Debra Lavric, Rose Horwood, Brenda Losier

Nova Scotia: Madeline Comeau and Kimberly Challis

Prince Edward Island: Doris McDonald

 

 

 

 

 

Printed by

 

WITT Newfoundland and Labrador

P.O. Box 23118

St. John's, NFLD

A1B 4J9

 

 

 

 

Acknowledgments

 

We would like to thank the large number of employers, government departments, organizations and women from Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and PEI who kindly participated in this research.

 

This research could not have been possible without the support and financial assistance of the Women's Program, Status of Women Canada and the invaluable network of women and men across this country who make up the WITT National Network - each and every one committed to the occupational integration of women.

 

Special thanks go to Helen Gosine of Human Resources Development Canada and Anne Marie Anonsen of Information By Design, St. John's, Nfld.

 

 

 


Table of Contents

INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................

Employment Equity as a Framework.....................................................................

Methodology.....................................................................................................................

PART 1: QUANTITATIVE DATA.......................................................................................

Legislated Employment Equity Program (LEEP)..............................................

LEEP Data from Treasury Board........................................................................................

Women in Other Designated Groups...................................................................................

Women in Atlantic Canada vs. Women Nationally.............................................................

LEEP Data Collected Through Questionnaires..................................................................

Federal Contractors Program (FCP)...................................................................

Federal Infrastructure Program.........................................................................

Mega-Projects..................................................................................................................

The Hibernia Construction Project.....................................................................................

Confederation Bridge (PEI Strait Crossing).......................................................................

Education..........................................................................................................................

Womenís Participation in Trades and Technology Programs.............................................

Registered Apprentices and Journeyed Women...................................................................

Women In Engineering........................................................................................................

PART II: FOCUS GROUPS..................................................................................................

Focus Group Summary.................................................................................................

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS...............................................................

APPENDIX A: STANDARD OCCUPATIONAL CLASSIFICATION

UNIT GROUPS.............................................................................................

APPENDIX B: DATA COLLECTION FORMS..................................................................

APPENDIX C: FOCUS GROUP AGENDA.........................................................................

ENDNOTES: .....................................................................................................................54

 

 

 

Introduction

 

This report is the result of a community research project undertaken by four Atlantic groups of Women in Trades and Technology (WITT): WITT Newfoundland and Labrador, WITT Nova Scotia, NB WITT, and PEI WITT.[1]Ý The research provides an overview of women's participation in employment and education programs focusing on technical occupations.Ý For the purposes of this report ëtechnicalí refers to trades, technology, operations (TTO), engineering and technical supervisory occupations.

 

In conducting this research, we concentrated on the following employers:

 

®       Legislated employment equity employers (LEEP)

®       Federal Contractors (FCP)

®       Mega-projects

®       Infrastructure projects.

 

In studying the participation of women in these occupational areas, we are provided insight into:

 

®       the level of representation of women employed in technical occupations in Atlantic Canada;

®       the participation rate of women in training programs for work on mega projects;

®       the number of women enrolled in or graduating from community college technicalÝ programs;

®       the number of women graduating from university engineering programs, and

®       women's experiences in accessing work or training in technical occupations.

 

Employment Equity as a Framework

 

A commitment to the occupational integration of women requires the removal of systemic and overt barriers found in training and employment systems and structures.Only through an integrated approach to employment equity can there be improvements in women's long-term attachment to the workforce and especially in occupations where they have been traditionally under-represented.Ý The Employment Equity Act of 1986 was the first proactive attempt to encourage a systemic approach to this problem:

 

To achieve equality in the workplace so that no person shall be denied employment opportunities or benefits for reasons unrelated to ability and in the fulfilment of that goal, to correct the conditions of disadvantage in employment experienced by women, aboriginal peoples, persons with disabilities and persons who are, because of their race or colour, in a visible minority in Canada, by giving effect to the principle that employment equity means more than treating persons in the same way, but also requires special measures and the accommodation of differences.[2]

Human Resources Development Canada (HRDC) states that employment equity is an action-oriented approach that identifies under-representation or concentration of, and employment barriers to, women and other groups of people.The Act refers to this particular group of people (women, aboriginal people, persons with disabilities and visible minorities) as the four designated groups.[3]Employment equity programs provide a number of practical and creative remedies to proactively resolve workplace issues which adversely impact on womenís participation in the workforce.

 

The Women in Technical Work in Atlantic Canada research was conducted with an understanding that the purpose of employment equity is to remove the conditions or barriers which work against the integration of women. An employment equity program therefore, should work proactively to:

 

®       increase the numbers of women in occupational areas where they are currently under-represented;

 

®       reduce discriminatory barriers through action, policy and education.This includes elimination or modification of all human resources practices or systems which cannot be shown to be bona fide occupational requirements;

 

®       introduce special measures and the establishment of internal goals which work towards increased participation of women by increasing the recruitment, hiring, training and promotion of women;

 

®       make reasonable accommodation to enable women to compete with other workers on an equal basis, and

 

®       monitor the retention and promotion of women who are trained and/or working in occupational areas where they are under-represented in the workforce.

 

This requires employers to review their employment systems, policies and practices with respect to:

®       the recruitment, selection and hiring of employees;

®       the development and training of employees;

®       the promotion of employees;

®       the retention and termination of employees, and

®       the reasonable accommodation of the special needs of members of designated groups.

 

Despite employment equity legislation, the Federal Contractor's Program and other long-term government policies such as HRDCís Designated Groups Policy, barriers to occupational integration still exist and women's work remains segregated. These barriers include inappropriate training, discrimination in hiring, inappropriate work practices and environments, sexual harassment and/or the perception of a culture of harassment, and family responsibility problems. These factors may be countered, or reinforced, by the attitudes, approaches and actions of employers, educators, managers, supervisors, labour representatives, co-workers, family and friends.

 

This report will provide quantitative and qualitative data that can be used as a basis of analysis for the relative success of employment equity initiatives.Obviously there are a number of factors that would need to be explored to fully account for the segregated nature of womenís employment.However, it is of critical importance that trends in womenís participation in the workforce be documented as a first step in achieving greater gender equality.This report will be useful to:

 

®       federal and provincial governments interested in implementing gender-based analysis and integrated equity policies in their departments and agencies;

®       LEEP and FCP employers, and other employers interested in recruiting women into their technical workforce;

 

®       community colleges and universities who wish to increase the number of women into their technical courses and engineering programs, and

 

®       local WITT groups and other organizations advocating for the occupational integration of women by providing them with a tool that can be used to inform women of the importance of working together.

 

Methodology

 

Employment Data

 

Data collection involved analysis of the 1995 and 1996 annual reports submitted to Treasury Board, Ottawa.Ý Research was confined to data on full-time permanent employees in the following employment equity occupational groups: middle management, professional, semi-professional, foremen/women, skilled crafts and semi-skilled manual occupational categories. (See Appendix A for a list of the Standard Occupational Classification Unit Groups covered under the employment equity occupational groups noted above).

 

Additional data specific to women's employment in technical occupations were gathered through the use of questionnaires sent to employers under the Federal Contractors Program and the Employment Equity Act, as well as employers who access large amounts of public funds for infrastructure or mega-projects. (See Appendix B for data collection forms).These data collection forms were developed in consultation with the researchers and members of the WITT locals throughout Atlantic Canada. Employers who came under LEEP and FCPprograms within the past two years were screened out because it takes at least two years to develop and implement an employment equity plan and realize any benefits to women.We also removed those LEEP and FCP employers who do not employ people in TTO and engineering occupations (i.e. the banking industry),

 

Data had been previously collected on the Hibernia construction project as a result of recent research completed by WITT Newfoundland and Labrador.[4] Assistance with current data collection was provided by the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador. Data were collected on the Confederation Bridge (PEI Strait Crossing) from Strait Crossing Inc., HRDC, and labour unions.

 

At the onset of data collection, LEEP, FCP and infrastructure employers were assured that the names of employers would not be published in this report. With the exception of the two mega-projects (Hibernia and the Confederation Bridge) and Canada Post, every effort has been made to maintain employer confidentiality.

 

When data collection was complete, the data were entered into a database for further analysis and reporting.

 

Education Data

Data were collected on male and female graduates for a five-year period from public and private schools and universities throughout Atlantic Canada.The areas of study include trades (with the exception of hairdressing and cooking), two and three-year technology courses and engineering programs. Due to inconsistencies in the collection and retrieval of college data by provincial governments throughout the Atlantic provinces, five years of data was not available from some provinces. For Nova Scotia, enrollment figures are used since graduation data were not available from the Department of Education. In addition, the number of students enrolled or graduated from trades programs includes both pre-apprenticeship and advanced block programs.

 

Qualitative Data

Focus groups were held in two locations in each of the four Atlantic provinces. Their purpose was to document women's experiences seeking TTO and engineering work. It included asking women to suggest strategies for change in the workplace, educational institutions, and government and to gather information on the types of initiatives which would be helpful at the community level.Ý The agenda for the focus groups was developed in consultation with the researchers in all four provinces. (See Appendix C for workshop agenda).

 

Participation in the focus groups was open to the general public. Meetings were advertised by women's centres, community colleges and community channel TV stations. In addition, members of WITT National Network who reside in the Atlantic Provinces were informed of the meetings by support staff in the WITT National Network office.

 

The facilitators of the focus groups took the opportunity to inform women about the WITT National Network and encouraged them to become actively involved in the various WITT locals throughout the Atlantic provinces. In this regard, women were asked to complete a questionnaire on what they needed most from WITT. The results of that questionnaire are available from the WITT locals and are separate from this report.

 

Employer Response

 

LEEP

The 1995 and 1996 employer reports submitted to Treasury Board were analyzed. Data were collected from 37 reports for 1995 and 35 reports for 1996. Then requests were made of LEEP employers ín human resource departments by project researchers. Data were collected only from employers who hire people in technical occupations, report from the Atlantic provinces, and have been required by legislation to implement employment equity for two years prior to this survey. Twenty-five employers were contacted throughout the Atlantic provinces and ten (40%) responded.

 

FCP

In Newfoundland and Labrador information was requested from 14 employers. Eight employers responded with the requested data, four of whom were unionized. Requests were made of 23 employers in Nova Scotia. Eighteen responded positively and eight of those were unionized. In New Brunswick 22 employers were contacted and responses were received from 14, five of whom were unionized. PEI does not have any FCP employers. The overall response rate of FCP employers was 68%.

 

Infrastructure

Most of the contractors who successfully bid on infrastructure projects responded to our questions over the phone rather than in writing. Although many of the contractors provided information with regard to female employees, they were not able to provide data on the number of males. This was due to the temporary nature of construction work.

 

 

part 1: quantitative data

Legislated Employment Equity Program (LEEP)

 

The Employment Equity Act applies to employers under federal jurisdiction and Crown corporations with 100 or more employees. Generally speaking, those employers operate primarily in the banking, transportation and communications industries. Section 4 of the Employment Equity Act sets out certain obligations for employers:

 

An employers shall, in consultation with such persons as have been designated by the employees to act as their representative or, where a bargaining agent represents the employees, in consultation with the bargaining agent, implement employment equity by:

(a) identifying and eliminating each of the employer's employment practices, not otherwise authorized by law, that results in employment barriers against persons in designated groups; and

(b) instituting such positive policies and practices and making such reasonable accommodation as will ensure that persons in designated groups achieve a degree of representation in the various positions of employment with the employer that is at least proportionate to their representation:

(i) in the work force; or

(ii) in those segments of the work force that are identifiable by qualifications, eligibility or geography and from which the employer may reasonably be expected to draw or promote employees.[5]

 

The Employment Equity Act also states that federally regulated employers are required to prepare an annual employment equity plan with goals and timetables, and to retain each plan and all records used to prepare their annual report at their principal place of business in Canada. The annual report must indicate the industrial sector, geographic location and employment status on the representation of designated group members by occupational group and salary range and to provide information on those hired, promoted and terminated. These reports are publicly available and are provided to the Canadian Human Rights Commission, which has the authority to initiate an investigation if it has reasonable grounds to believe that systemic discrimination is indicated by the data in the reports.[6]

 

LEEP Data from Treasury Board

In the LEEP annual reports, the occupational categories where the majority of technical occupations are found include middle managers, professionals, semi-professionals, foremen/women, skilled crafts and trades and semi-skilled manual workers. Tables #1 and #2 indicate the number and percentage of women and men in permanent full-time employment with LEEP employers in the Atlantic provinces during 1995 and 1996.

 

 

 

NB

NF

NS

PEI

 

OCCUPATIONAL GROUP

 

F

M

F

M

F

M

F

M

Total F

Total All

%Femaleof Total

Middle Managers

138

309

217

335

348

685

26

28

729

2086

35%

Professionals

38

105

36

123

76

218

8

13

158

617

26%

Semi-Professionals

46

214

32

210

110

652

6

25

194

1295

15%

Foremen/Women

16

224

0

41

8

374

3

20

27

686

4%

Skilled Trades

4

905

10

1320

32

1933

1

270

45

3937

1%

Semi-Skilled Manual Labour

7

737

1

345

41

1569

37

224

86

2961

3%

Total

249

2494

296

2374

615

5431

81

580

1241

12120

10%

Percentage of Females

9%

11%

10%

12%

Ý10%

 

 

Table # 1 : 1995 LEEP Data from Treasury Board Annual Reports

 

 

 

NB

NF

NS

PEI

 

OCCUPATIONAL GROUP

 

F

M

F

M

F

M

F

M

Total F

Total All

%Femaleof Total

Middle Managers

183

340

214

301

313

588

29

37

739

2005

37%

Professionals

113

346

45

108

94

198

0

1

252

905

28%

Semi-Professionals

82

341

26

192

99

536

1

5

208

1282

16%

Foremen/Women

19

238

0

16

6

263

0

21

25

563

4%

Skilled Trades

18

1197

12

716

24

1637

2

278

56

3884

1%

Semi-Skilled Manual Labour

22

821

1

272

41

1793

53

278

117

3281

4%

Total

437

2462

298

1605

577

5015

85

620

1397

11099

13%

Percentage of Females

15%

16%

10%

12%

Ý13%

 

 

Table #2 : 1996 LEEP Data from Treasury Board Annual Reports

 

The above figures show an increase from 1995 to 1996 in womenís representation in middle management, professional, semi-professional and semi-skilled manual work. There is a marginal increase in the number of women in the skilled trades group. Womenís employment increased overall by 3% in 1996 over 1995 figures. This was mainly due to a significant increase in the employment of women in New Brunswick in virtually every occupational group. The representation of women decreased in Nova Scotia while PEI and Newfoundland experienced very small increases.Ý With the exception of PEI, the numbers of men decreased in 1996.

 

It should be noted that when Canada Post is removed from the data, the percentage of women in middle management decreases from 35% to 27% in 1995 and from 37% to 28% in 1996 and the overall percentage of women decreases from 10% to 7% in 1995 and from 13% to 10% in 1996.

 

In their annual reports, many LEEP employers took the opportunity to describe their efforts to increase opportunities for designated group members. The following indicates some of their approaches:

 

We focused on recruiting and a referral program since it would impact our workforce immediately. Human Resource recruiters focused their attention on advertising in non-traditional areas as well as building relationships with designated group agencies. ... Forging positive contacts with community organizations have had a direct result in placing designated group members in various areas of [our company].

 

Another LEEP employer wrote about the impact of the poor economy on their ability to hire at all. As the following report illustrates, they have implemented some initiatives that have been directed at women. However, they have not resulted in increased employment of women with the company.

 

We continue to provide financial assistance to employees interested in furthering their education. Approximately 20% of the women working for [the company] applied for and received funding from [the company] to pursue their educational goals. One female was successful in obtaining her BA which was partially funded by [the company] on a year-to-year basis; she was recently promoted to a position with Human Resources. [They] also have a continuing education program for its five Occupational Health nurses - all of whom are women. Furthermore, we provide educational bursaries to 21 women of high-school age to pursue a university education. We also sponsor a Junior Achievement Company (JA) which is made up of approximately 50% females.

 

Women in Other Designated Groups

 

Further analysis of the 1995 and 1996 LEEP reports for the four Atlantic provinces indicates the number of aboriginal women, women with disabilities and visible minority women in permanent full-time employment. Table #3 shows their total participation in the occupational groups used in the analysis above (middle managers, professionals, semi-professionals, forewomen, skilled crafts workers, and semi-skilled manual workers). The number of aboriginal women, women with disabilities and visible minority women in technical occupations increased in New Brunswick and Nova Scotia but the overall numbers remain low.

 

 

 

NB

NF

NS

PEI

Designated Group

1995

1996

1995

1996

1995

1996

1995

1996

Aboriginal Women

3

4

4

4

0

0

4

0

Women With Disabilities

7

9

9

4

5

9

1

0

Visible Minority Women

8

13

1

0

6

14

0

0

 

Table #3 : 1995 and 1996 LEEP Data for Other Designated Groups

Source: Treasury Board Annual Reports 1995 and 1996

 

 

Women in Atlantic Canada vs. Women Nationally

 

When women's employment with LEEP employers in Atlantic Canada is compared to women with LEEP employers nation wide, the figures show that the degree of under-representation is greater in Atlantic Canada. Compared to the rest of Canada, there are 10% less women in middle management positions, 14% less women in professional occupations, and 5% less women in semi-professional occupations. In Atlantic Canada there are 1.5% less women in forewomen positions, 2% less in skilled trades and 1.5% less in semi-skilled manual labour positions. The latter are occupations where women are under-represented nationwide. Figure #1 further illustrates this point.

 

 

Figure #1:Ý Women in Atlantic Canada vs. Women Nationally

LEEP Data Collected Through Questionnaires

 

This research attempted to focus more specifically on the number of women employed in technical occupations by LEEP employers. As a result, the following data were collected from ten LEEP employers in the Atlantic provinces. The job categories included technical supervisors, engineers, technologists, skilled trades people and operators (i.e. heavy equipment, truck drivers). These categories encompass the majority of occupations which would generally be classified as TTO and engineering occupations.

 

Job Categories

NB

NF

NS

Total F

Total

% F

 

F

M

F

M

F

M

 

 

 

Technical Supervisor

1

25

2

8

3

144

6

183

3.3%

Engineering

1

48

0

1

0

25

1

75

1.3%

Technology

4

46

1

0

0

36

5

87

5.7%

Trades

3

335

1

2

0

368

4

709

0.6%

Operations

9

227

3

140

1

1151

13

1531

0.8%

Total

18

681

8

151

4

1724

28

2585

1.1%

Percentage Female

2.50%

 

5%

 

0.20%

 

 

 

 

 

Table #4: LEEP Data Collected Through Questionnaires: 1997

 

LEEP employers in New Brunswick employ the greatest number of women in most technical jobs although the percentage of females is greatest (5%) in Newfoundland. Even though most employment opportunities are found in the skilled trades areas, the representation of women remains extremely low - 1% in both the 1995 and 1996 annual reports and 0.6% in the above data collected through questionnaires. The overall percentage of women in TTO and engineering occupations was 1.1% for the 10 employers who responded, representing 40% of those surveyed.

 

Federal Contractors Program (FCP)

 

The Federal Contractors Program (FCP) was designed to ensure that organizations who do business with the Government of Canada achieve and maintain a representative workforce. FCP is actually a government policy which did not have legislative basis until the Employment Equity Act was revised in 1996. With the new legislation, Human Resources Development Canada have to ensure that the FCP requirements of employers with regard to implementation of employment equity, will be equivalent to those of employers under the Act. FCP applies to suppliers of goods and services to the federal government who have 100 or more employees and successfully bid on contracts of $200,000 or more. Exemptions include companies accessing government contracts related to the purchase or lease of real property and construction contracts regardless of size. All Canadian suppliers and foreign suppliers with a resident workforce in Canada are covered by this policy.

 

HRDC monitors the Federal Contractors Program and outlines the guidelines as follows:

  Organizations which bid on contracts are required to commit themselves to implementing employment equity and to certify this commitment as a condition of their bid.

The terms and conditions of this commitment require contractors to satisfactorily fulfill a number of program criteria. These include determining and analyzing the internal workforce; eliminating policies and practices that have an adverse impact on designated groups; identifying areas for change; establishing goals and timetables for the hiring and promotion of designated group members; and developing an action plan to achieve the stated goals.

Certified contractors will be subject to on-site compliance reviews by HRDC officials at any point after the award of a contract. Should a compliance review indicate a failure to respect the commitment to implement employment equity, sanctions may be applied, which could include the exclusion of the employer from future government business.[7]

 

The following data were collected in 1997 from FCP employers who have been under the program since 1994 (Prince Edward Island has no employers under the Federal Contractors Program). Table #5 and Figure #2 illustrate the participation rate of women who work as technical supervisors, engineers, technologists, trades and operations workers.Ý Women are best represented (22%) in the technology category. Data indicate that most of this increase is due to the efforts of one employer in Newfoundland. Overall, women make up 10% of the TTO and engineering workforce with FCP employers. The representation of women in TTO and engineering occupations in unionized environments is lowest in Newfoundland (2%), 6% in New Brunswick and 11% in Nova Scotia.

 

Job Categories

NB

NF

NS

 

 

 

Non-union

Union

Non-union

Union

Non-union

Union

 

 

 

F

M

F

M

F

M

F

M

F

M

F

M

Total

% F

Technical Supervisor

17

21

0

22

5

29

5

17

15

159

0

7

297

14

Engineering

2

24

3

177

11

85

0

4

4

99

3

11

423

5

Technology

58

62

21

520

117

190

29

124

9

42

51

70

1293

22

Trades

9

253

42

1129

7

27

5

1152

1

95

21

1811

4552

2

Operations

15

84

75

455

21

107

3

577

118

281

218

592

2546

18

Total

101

444

141

2303

161

438

42

1874

147

676

293

2491

9111

10

PercentageÝ Female

19%

6%

27%

2%

18%

11%

 

 

Table #5:Ý Women vs. Men in TTO and Engineering with FCP Employers: 1997

 

Figure II:Ý Female vs. Male Employees, FCP Employers, 1997

 

Federal Infrastructure Program

 

The Federal Infrastructure Program is a partnership program between federal, provincial and municipal governments for the purpose of upgrading/installing water and sewer systems, buildings and roads. The federal government contributes partial funds and the province and municipality contribute the remainder.

 

In Newfoundland and Labrador data were requested of 32 contractors. Responses received from 28 indicate that a total of five women were employed in TTO and engineering positions on projects valued at $5,031,629. Two companies reported hiring a total of seven women for flagging positions directing traffic around the construction site.

 

In Nova Scotia data were requested of seven contractors and responses received from four. On projects valued at $721,329, one woman was employed in technical work. Two companies reported that the only women hired were in temporary positions as flaggers.

 

In New Brunswick requests were made of 15 contractors and responses received from 14. A total of four women were employed in technical positions on projects totaling $12,445,000. One company reported hiring women for 'flagging' positions.

 

In PEI information was requested of 37 contractors and responses received from 11. On projects valued at $11,281,000, 16 women were employed in TTO and engineering positions. Eight companies reported hiring women for 'flagging' positions.

 

Mega-Projects

 

In the past five years, Atlantic Canadaís economy has benefited from the construction of two mega-projects: the Hibernia construction project at Mosquito Cove, Newfoundland and the Confederation Bridge (PEI Strait Crossing). Both projects had skill shortage training programs which were funded almost entirely by HRDC.

 

The Hibernia Construction Project

 

This section provides an overview of the Hibernia construction project as outlined in the 1996 WITT Newfoundland and Labrador report entitled "Women, Employment Equity and the Hibernia Construction Project."[8]

 

The development of the Hibernia offshore oilfield was one of the largest construction projects in Canadian history. It has required expenditures of over $5 billion and is of great significance to the economy of Canada and, in particular, Newfoundland. Work developing the Mosquito Cove construction site, 140 km west of St. John's, started in late 1990. This is the location of the construction of the massive concrete base of the production platform, one topsides module and various topsides assemblies. It is also the site of the assembly of the topsides and its mating with the base.

 

It was originally planned that the site would have a peak labour force of 3,600 workers; subsequent design and scheduling changes have meant that this has increased and by 1995, the anticipated total on-site employment was about 5000 workers. Other project work in Newfoundland has been focused in St. John's, with fabrication, engineering and administrative activity, while fabrication and engineering work has also taken place at Marystown on the Burin Peninsula, which has a major offshore fabrication yard. Smaller contracts (for instance, for the supply of aggregates and the workcamp accommodation units) have been awarded to companies operating in various other Newfoundland communities.

 

This project work was an attempt to ensure that Hibernia met Newfoundland and Canadian benefits commitments spelled out in the project development agreement. These required that Canada receive 55 to 60% of the estimated $5.2 billion pre-production expenditures, 65% of the $10.0 billion operating expenditures, 13,000 (70% of the total) person-years of construction employment, and 20,000 person-years of production employment.Ý Much of this work has occurred in Newfoundland, which was guaranteed employment on the base, topside module, topside assemblies and other construction activity to a total of 10,000 person-years, as well as much of the production employment.

 

These commitments by the Hibernia consortium (incorporated in 1990 as the Hibernia Management and Development Company (HMDC)) were made in exchange for major financial support by the federal government. It committed to pay 25% of the construction costs to a total of $1.04 billion and provide loan guarantees for 40% of these costs to a maximum of $1.66 billion. The main motivation of the government in agreeing to these terms was spelled out by the senior federal representative at the 1990 signing ceremony: 'the significant financial commitment by the federal government to make Hibernia happen is a clear demonstration of our determination to overcome regional disparities in Atlantic Canada.' [9] He continued to say that Hibernia is a major regional development and employment project, and an important step in developing an offshore oil industry, rather than the major generator of resource revenues once anticipated.

 

At the start-up of the Hibernia construction project, $18 million was allocated for unionized skill-shortage training by HRDC. The provincial government provided additional funds. As of May, 1995, most of the training had been completed and the following data outline the participation rates of women and men.

 

As of May, 1995, HRDC funded 3,127 seats for Hibernia-related training;

 

- 2,361 men, representing 96% of training participants, accessed 2,960 seats in programs;

 

- 102 women, representing 4% of participants, accessed 167 seats; and

 

-1909 trainees had subsequently gained employment at the site; 1,844 (97%) were men and 65 (3%) were women.[10]

 

At its peak, about 200 women worked on the Hibernia Construction site, mainly in clerk and camp attendant positions. Forty women worked in trades, technology and engineering positions. As of May, 1996, women represented 4% of the total workforce.

 

Statistics from the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador outline womenís representation in technical jobs in the current production phase of the Hibernia project:

 

- 18 women (4%) and 350 men working offshore, and

 

- 64 women (12%) and 238 men onshore.

 

Some of the positions held by women include fluids lab technician, logging engineer, well completions engineering team leader, technical document specialist and process, pipeline, QA, planning engineer.

 

ÝConfederation Bridge (PEI Strait Crossing)

 

Construction on the Confederation Bridge began in 1993. Described by project officials as the 'largest public/private partnering in Canada,' it was entirely designed, financed and built by the private sector - Strait Crossing Inc. (SCI). It is to be maintained and operated by SCI for 35 years according to the development agreement with Public Works Canada.

 

Although SCI will not release the total cost of constructing the bridge, it is valued at $840 million.Ý SCI is guaranteed $41.9 million (1992 dollars indexed at inflation over 35 years) for 35 years from the Federal government. The federal government also contributed $5 million each to PEI and New Brunswick to take care of stress on the highways due to the construction of the bridge. HRDC provided funds for training some of the workers on the project and continues to provide training for displaced ferry workers. ACOA has made funds available to employers and new businesses to open in the Borden-Carlton area of PEI. This community consists mainly of displaced workers from Marine Atlantic.

 

Workers were referred to work on the project by the respective construction trade union. The total workforce was 2500, 250 of whom were women working in a variety of occupational areas although the majority worked in flagging and maintenance (cleaning/janitorial) positions.

 

Training was provided in skill shortage and project specific areas. Candidates for training were selected by the five construction trade unions. During 1994-96, the total training expenditure by HRDC was $1, 356,751. These costs breakdown into two categories: course costs ($857,081) and income support ($499,670). There were 784 men and 38 women (4.6%) who received training for the project. Women were trained in post-tensioning and rebar work, and 36 of them completed the training.Ý Of the women trained, one was native and one was disabled.

 

The majority of women who were trained to work on the Strait Crossing in rebar and post tension work were hired in construction maintenance positions instead. Most of them worked as flaggers and maintenance workers on the support ferries. Four women worked as security guards, 2 as bus drivers, 1 in post tensioning, 2 in rebar, and 1 in concrete work. One woman civil engineer worked on the project.


Education

 

Our purpose in collecting data from colleges and universities was to document the number of women in TTO and engineering programs and to look for patterns or trends in their participation over time. As is noted in the methodology section, a variety of approaches were utilized by the four provinces to collect and retrieve statistical data on the numbers of students in their college systems. As a result, some inconsistencies arose from province to province in the number of years in which data were available.

 

Womenís Participation in Trades and Technology Programs

 

PEI

 

The following table illustrates the number of women and men graduates in trades and technology courses in the public college system in PEI. The number of women in technology programs has decreased while the number of men has increased. In 1993, women were 22% of technology graduates and in 1997 they were 14%. There has been no substantial increase in the number of women in trades programs; over the past five years the number has remained consistently very low. In 1993, women were 1.8% of the graduates from trades programs and in 1997, they were 4%.

 

 

PEI Graduates

1997

1996

1995

1994

1993

Technology:

 

 

 

 

 

ÝÝ Females

55

44

62

70

73

ÝÝ Males

325

234

266

234

254

ÝÝ % Female

14.5%

15.8%

18.9%

23%

22.3%

Trades*:

 

 

 

 

 

ÝÝ Females

13

11

7

10

11

ÝÝ Males

307

284

383

462

583

ÝÝ % Female

4%

3.7%

1.8%

2.1%